HomeCriminal InvestigationsOut Of Court Disposals

Out Of Court Disposals

Avoiding Prosecution: The Importance of Early Intervention 

Olliers Solicitors is recognised as one of the UK’s leading criminal defence practices. With offices in Manchester and London, our specialist team of 27 solicitors is consistently ranked in Tier 1 by both the Legal 500 and Chambers UK, and we are seven-time winners of the Manchester Legal Awards Crime Team of the Year. 

What sets us apart from other firms is our focus on the pre-charge engagement stage of a case – a crucial window of opportunity where early, strategic intervention can prevent a case from progressing to a prosecution.  

We work tirelessly to ensure our clients are not charged. We will always look to argue that there is not a ‘realistic prospect of conviction’ or that a prosecution is not in the ‘public interest’, these being the requirements of the Charging Standard contained within the Code for Crown Prosecutors. 

When arguing that a prosecution is not in the public interest we will look at every available out of court disposal. The last thing we want our clients to see is the inside of a courtroom. 

The Public Interest Test: A Vital Opportunity to Stop a Case in its Tracks 

We work closely with our clients, the police, and prosecution authorities to argue that a prosecution is not justified, particularly in cases involving first time offenders, low level or non-violent allegations, cases involving young persons, those with mental health problems or particular vulnerabilities. We will also look at cases which may be better resolved through restorative justice or rehabilitative outcomes. 

By engaging at the earliest possible stage, we give our clients the best possible chance of being prosecuted. 

Understanding Out-of-Court Disposals 

Out-of-court disposals can be formal or informal mechanisms used by police and prosecutors to resolve cases without the need for court proceedings. They are particularly useful where the public interest in prosecuting is low, and a person is willing to engage with alternatives. An effective defence representative needs to have a thorough understanding of all the available options. 

Below is a summary of the main options available, as well as those expected to come into force shortly: 

  1. Community Resolution

A Community Resolution is an informal agreement between police, the offender, and sometimes the victim. The offender must take responsibility for their actions, which may involve a written apology, or some kind of restitution, or reparative work. It is suitable for minor offences where remorse is shown – and it does not result in a criminal record.  

An admission of guilt will be required, so in some cases it may be necessary to go back to the police, for example if an admission was not made during an interview under caution. 

  1. Simple Caution for Adults

The Simple Caution is available as a formal warning issued by the police to an adult who admits an offence. It is used where prosecution may not be in the public interest but the conduct should not go without consequence. It avoids court and the potential consequences of a conviction. 

  1. Conditional Cautions for Adults

Conditional Cautions are similar to simple cautions but contain conditions that the individual must comply with – for example paying compensation or attending rehabilitation. It is possible for a defence representative to suggest conditions. If conditions are complied with, no further action is taken. If the conditions are not met, then the case may proceed to prosecution.  

  1. Diversionary and Community Cautions (not in force as at May 2025)

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 introduced a new two-tier cautioning framework that will replace simple and conditional cautions referred to above: 

  • Diversionary Cautions: these are for more serious offending and contain mandatory rehabilitative conditions. 
  • Community Cautions: apply to less serious matters with optional conditions. 

It is not known when these will come into force but they reflect a will on the part of the last government to standardise out-of-court disposals, promote early resolution, and prioritise rehabilitation over punishment. 

  1. Deferred Prosecution

A Deferred Prosecution involves an agreement between the police and suspect to delay prosecution while the individual complies with certain terms, such as attending counselling or engaging with a treatment programme. As long as the terms are fulfilled, prosecution is avoided altogether. Again, this approach reflects a trend towards restorative justice and rehabilitation and keeping individuals away from the criminal justice system. 

  1. Community Protection Notices (CPNs)

Community Protection Notices are civil orders intended to prevent individuals from engaging in anti-social behaviour. Whilst not part of the criminal process, breaching a CPN can lead to criminal sanctions. So, they provide an opportunity to address behaviour without an immediate prosecution. 

  1. Domestic Violence and Domestic Abuse Notices (DVPNs and DVPOs)

Domestic Violence Notices and Orders provide immediate protection in domestic abuse cases. In the first instance a DVPN is issued by the police. It must be followed by an application to the magistrates’ court for a DVPO. Orders can prevent contact or remove someone from a property temporarily without the need for criminal proceedings. They can run contemporaneous to an investigation but a prosecution need not automatically follow. 

  1. Penalty Notices for Disorder (PNDs)

Penalty Notices for Disorder are fixed fines which are issued for low-level anti-social or nuisance behaviours. Accepting a PND does not amount to an admission of guilt and does not constitute a criminal conviction.  

  1. No Further Action (NFA)

Clearly the best outcome, NFA is where there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of a conviction or prosecution is clearly not in the public interest. At Olliers this outcome is frequently achieved through effective pre charge representations against charge. 

Why Early Representation Matters  

At Olliers we believe that the police investigation or pre charge engagement  stage of a case is where the greatest impact can be achieved. 

Without proper representation, suspects under investigation may find themselves sleepwalking into a prosecution. Individuals risk missing opportunities to prevent charges, losing control of how their case develops, or being unfairly prosecuted when better alternatives are available. 

Our experienced team of criminal defence specialists at Olliers has successfully prevented thousands of prosecutions by intervening early, making detailed written representations, and negotiating out-of-court resolutions that avoid the stigma and consequences of criminal court proceedings. 

Contact Olliers – Experts in Pre-Charge Representation 

If you, or someone you know, are under police investigation, don’t wait until it’s too late. 

Contact Olliers Solicitors today and speak to one of our award-winning, pre-charge specialists.  

We will: 

  • Assess whether your case is likely to meet the CPS charging standard 
  • Identify opportunities to divert the case away from prosecution 
  • Work to secure an out-of-court disposal or argue for No Further Action 

We understand that facing a criminal investigation is stressful and overwhelming. Our team is here to guide you, protect you, and fight for the best possible outcome and most important of all – keep your case out of the courtroom. 

Contact us today for a confidential consultation.

Complete the form below and we will contact you

Contact Us 2025
Where possible we prefer to discuss recommendations with you over the phone, will this be possible?
What is the best time to call?
Are there any police bail dates, court dates, interviews or other deadlines that you are aware of?
Do you have any legal professionals already instructed?

Manchester

Head Office

London

Satellite Office

Investigations Menu

Related Articles

Case Studies

Case Study One
21-year-old male of good character faced allegation of date rape in which the complainant claimed to have been unconscious for ten hours. Olliers were able to prove social media activity throughout the night and downloading of an app together with text activity from the alleged victim the following day. Olliers also provided police with details of a flatmate who witnessed sexual activity. Police were also provided with a motive for the fabricated complaint. Following representations to the police, matter came to a swift conclusion without even going to the Crown Prosecution Service for a charging decision.

Case Study Two
Young man faced allegation of sexual assault in a nightclub. It was suggested that he had assaulted a complete stranger without any earlier interaction. Olliers were able to show that alleged victim had in fact connected with the suspect on WhatsApp at the time of the incident which would have been impossible on her version of events. Olliers were also able to show that complainant’s boyfriend had unexpectedly arrived in the nightclub which gave an explanation and motive for the false allegation. No charges were brought.

Case Study Three
Client faced an allegation of historic rape based upon one incident thirty years earlier. Olliers were able to produce to the police a poem sent to the defendant by the complainant ten years previously i.e. twenty years after the alleged incident in which she admitted to her infatuation with the suspect at the time of the incident. Representations were made including a defence explanation for the allegations being made.  Crown Prosecution Service took the view that there was not a realistic prospect of conviction and no charges were brought.

Case Study Four
Client  was arrested and interviewed under caution in connection with historic allegations of rape. He was subsequently released under investigation pending further police enquiries. On contacting Olliers, we immediately adopted a proactive approach and established contact with both the officer in the case and the duty solicitor who had represented the client at the police station. Following detailed consideration of the police station notes, and on taking thorough instructions from our client, we drafted representations against charge on his behalf. The aim of our representations was to persuade the Crown Prosecution Service that there was ‘not a realistic prospect of conviction’ as required by the Code for Crown Prosecutors. The police investigation was ongoing for some time and we periodically liaised with the investigating officer to provide the client with updates. Having considered our representations, the police decided to take no further action against our client and the matter came to a close.

Case Study Five
Our client was arrested and interviewed under caution in relation to historic allegations of rape, sexual assault and controlling or coercive behaviour. He was subsequently released under investigation pending further police enquiries. The client contacted Olliers shortly after his arrest. Following this, we obtained the case papers from the duty solicitor who had represented him during interview. We also established contact with the investigating officer and drew their attention to some initial points about the case which would require further investigation. As the investigation developed, we drafted comprehensive representations against charge based on our client’s detailed instructions and relevant material he had provided. On considering our representations, the police decided to take no further action against our client and the matter was concluded.

Case Study Six
Our clients were directors of a payment processing company. This was a multi-jurisdictional investigation involving restraint of assets on several continents. Extensive police liaison took place, a substantial amount of exculpatory material was provided to the police. Complex and ultimately successful applications to vary and discharge restraint orders were made. Representations against charge were submitted. The matter concluded following a successful application under the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 for return of items unlawfully seized by police and decision was made to take no further action against our clients.

Case Study Seven
Client E was arrested and interviewed under caution concerning allegations of rape and sexual assault. He was released under investigation as the police continued with their enquiries. Client E contacted Olliers only a few days following his arrest to request pre-charge representation. We swiftly proceeded to make contact with the investigating officer to establish a line of communication. We also quickly obtained the case papers from the duty solicitor whom represented Client E at the police station. For the following five months, we maintained contact with the investigating officer and regularly liaised with them regarding bail requirements and the progress of their investigation. After in-depth consideration of the police station notes and all of the information and instructions provided by the client, we disclosed some material to the investigating officer concerning the allegations. Following review by the police and consideration of their lines of enquiry, a decision to take no further action was reached thereby concluding the investigation.