Laura Baumanis, criminal defence solicitor
Laura joined Olliers in 2005 and qualified as a solicitor in 2008. She is an outstanding Magistrates’ Court advocate and appears in courts across the country on a daily basis representing the best interests of her clients.
Since joining the firm, Laura has worked on a number of serious criminal cases which, of note, include high profile human trafficking cases, murders and many conspiracies to supply drugs. Laura now specialises in the defence of those under investigation particularly for offences of sexual nature.
Representation during criminal investigations
Laura is known for her pro-active approach during the ongoing investigation stage of a case. An interview under caution is an extremely important stage of the process but it is often after the police interview that the real work begins. She will always look to bring an investigation to a conclusion without the need for a prosecution. She is known for her strategic approach liaising with investigators throughout. She applies a combination of formal and informal representations to police and prosecutors ensuring that the chances of a prosecution are kept to a minimum. Laura has significant experience in dealing with cases at this stage particularly cases involving sexual allegations and indecent images.
Legal Aid is not available during this stage of a case.
Interviews under caution
Laura regularly attends interviews under caution particularly voluntary interviews which take place by arrangement with the police. She will always look to obtain early disclosure of allegations against her client so that meticulous preparation for the interview can take place. This will ensure that the most effective strategies are deployed at the police station. When clients are released under investigation Laura will then consider how best to ensure successful outcome to the investigation (see below).
Specialist Magistrates’ Court trial advocate
Since qualification, however, Laura has concentrated her time predominantly on providing quality advice and assistance at the police stations and appearing on a daily basis in the Magistrates’ Court. In this time she has gained and maintained an excellent reputation as an advocate, boasting an impressive acquittal rate when it comes to trials as well as securing notable results when dealing with sentences, bail applications and various ancillary applications.
Laura prides herself in being able to deal with any type of criminal offence during both the pre and post charge stages, and puts at the heart of her representation her clients needs. Pre-charge work covers the full spectrum of cases ranging from offences of dishonesty, sexual offences, drugs offences. Laura has a particular specialism in cases of domestic violence and harassment.
She understands that, to many, finding themselves on the wrong side of the law is a daunting and often overwhelming experience, and dedicates much of her time to addressing these issues. Her priority is to ensure that each client receives confident, professional and accurate legal advice within a context that provides them with the maximum amount of reassurance and support. Her experience ensures that the best possible outcome is reached in each and every case.
Laura does not generally accept trial instructions on a legally aided basis.
Football Banning Orders
Laura also specialises in the defence of football related offences including public order offences arising both pre and post football matches. She has considerable experience of successfully opposing football banning orders before the Magistrates’ Court.
Laura in the Media
Due to Laura’s experience and impressive reputation she is frequently asked to comment on issues relating to criminal law by the national media.
Laura was recently quoted in The Guardian highlighting her concerns about the prevalence of spice in prisons. Read more.
Laura also spoke to Vice about the law surrounding the supply of drugs. Read more.
- “I couldn’t be happier with the service and representation I received from Laura Baumanis and Olliers. From initial contact and then throughout the case, Laura was easily contactable, explained everything clearly and demonstrated expertise and knowledge which all helped me immensely.”
- “From the prompt response to my initial enquiry and the friendly and helpful office staff; I was impressed from the start. Laura’s advice throughout was spot on and she was a huge help. When you’re facing a situation that you’ve never faced before you need a Laura by your side.”
- “Thanks for all your help. If it wasn’t for you I’d be serving a 3 year ban. I really am grateful and I’d not hesitate to recommend you.”
- “I want to say a big big thank you for the other night. I was expecting that to be the most nerve wracking experience of my life, but you really put me at ease, which allowed me to give my evidence as clearly as I could. Very very much appreciated!”
- “I still can’t thank you enough. I know it’s just your job to you. But to me and my family I can’t tell you how pleased we all are with the result.
- I have only ever had three other encounters with solicitors. You by far are the most down to earth, polite, professional and approachable of them all.”
- “An absolute masterclass performance, confident and knowledgeable.”
- “Would just like to say many thanks to you and your team. Laura was an absolute blessing in court … she kicked ass …. “
- R v C 2020 – racially aggravated PO at a football match. Instructed after interview to undertake pre charge work. Her pro-active approach in obtaining evidence in support of the defence resulted in no further action being taken.
- R v D 2020 – rape. Instructed after interview to undertake pre-charge work. As a result of the work undertake on behalf of the defendant and representations made to the police no further action was taken.
- R v E 2020 – common assault (DV). Laura successful opposed the Crown’s application to adjourn the trial when they were not in a position to proceed on the day. No evidence offered and the case was dismissed
- R v P 2019 – successful post charge representations in relation to charges of harassment and criminal damage in a neighbours dispute. Crown discontinued the case after the first appearance as a result of lengthy written representations put forward by Laura.
- R v U 2019 – outraging public decency. Laura successfully defended the client at trial and despite there being three witnesses to the incident in question, he was found not guilty
- R v R 2019 – sexual assault x 2. Two separate allegations of sexual assault were made against R by former colleagues. Laura represented him throughout proceedings and secured him an acquittal at the conclusion of his trial
- R v B 2019 – s47 assault (DV). Instructed after interview to undertake pre-charge work. Detailed representations were made to the Crown which resulted in no further action being taken against him.
- R v C 2019 – rape. Laura was instructed to represent C at the police station when arrested for an allegation of rape. Following on from her advice and attendance upon the client no further action was taken
- R v G 2019 – contested application for a football banning order following a conviction for a Public Order offence. Laura was instructed after the guilty plea had been entered. Successfully opposed the Crown’s application for a FBO
- R v R 2019 – possession of indecent images. Laura represented R who was charged with one count of possession of a category A image. Successfully persuaded the Magistrates’ Court not only to deal with the case rather than commit the matter to the Crown Court for sentence, but to deal with the matter by way of a suspended sentence rather than an immediate period of imprisonment.
- R v L 2018 – Successfully opposed imposition of Football Banning Order following a guilty plea to pitch invasion.
- R v Z 2017 – Three handed case of pitch invasion. Laura’s client was the only person to avoid the imposition of a Football Banning Order.
- R v Y 2017 – Theft from employer. Client was acquitted despite CCTV evidence purporting to show the offence.
- R v X 2017 – DV assault. Acquitted after trial.
- R v W 2017 – Victimless prosecution. Crown sought to rely upon res gestae evidence. Laura successfully opposed the Crown’s application to adduce such evidence and the case was dismissed