• About Us
  • Careers
  • CSR
  • Our Lawyers
  • News
  • Videos
  • Funding
  • FAQs
  • London
0161 834 1515
020 3883 6790
info@olliers.com
  • Pre-Charge
    • Pre-Charge
    • Voluntary police interviews
    • Released under investigation
    • Pre-charge engagement
    • Charging guidance
    • National File Standard
  • Criminal law
    • Criminal law
    • Allegations of Common Assault in Domestic Abuse Cases
    • Assault & grievous bodily harm
    • Assisting An Offender
    • Autism
    • Controlling and coercive behaviour
    • Criminal defence for professionals
    • Crisis management
    • Defending allegations of domestic abuse
    • DVPN/DVPO
    • Drugs offences
    • PNC arrest record removal
    • Fare Evasion Lawyers
    • Firearms
    • Internet & cyber crime
    • Kidnap & false imprisonment
    • The Magistrates’ Court
    • Murder & manslaughter
    • Non-fatal strangulation
    • People trafficking & Modern Slavery Act
    • Robbery and theft
    • Terrorism
    • Youth crime
  • Sexual offences
    • Sexual offences
    • Indecent Images Offence Lawyers
    • Rape and sexual assault
    • Removal from Sex Offenders Register
    • Revenge porn
    • Sexual communication with a child
    • Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPO)
  • Fraud
    • Fraud
    • Corruption and bribery
    • Cryptocurrency investigations
    • Dawn raids
    • Defending allegations of furlough fraud
    • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigations
    • HMRC investigations
    • Insolvency Service investigations and prosecutions
    • Money laundering
    • Serious Fraud Office (SFO) investigations
  • Regulatory
    • Regulatory
    • Data Protection offences
    • Director disqualification
    • Environmental damage
    • Food safety
    • Health & Safety (HSE) prosecutions
    • General Product Safety Regulations (GPSR)
    • Intellectual property prosecutions
    • Insolvency Service Investigations
    • Public Inquiries and Inquests
    • Trading standards prosecutions
    • Covid-19 Public Inquiry
  • Professional Discipline
    • Professional Discipline
    • Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS)
    • General Medical Council (GMC) Lawyers
    • Student Misconduct Proceedings
    • Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) Lawyers
  • Asset recovery
    • Benefit and available amount
    • Criminal lifestyle POCA
    • Enforcement receivers
    • Hidden assets
    • Restraint orders
    • Sentencing & enforcement
    • Unexplained Wealth Orders
      • Uplift Applications
  • More…
    • Alcohol and fireworks offences
    • Drink driving
    • Drug driving / driving whilst unfit
    • Extradition proceedings
    • Football banning orders
    • Football offences
    • Football offences news
    • Football stadium offences
    • Motoring offences
    • Public Order Act offences
  • Contact

Removal from Sex Offenders Register

  1. Home
  2. Sexual Offences
  3. Removal from Sex Offenders Register

Lawyers specialising in Sex Offender Register removal cases

The Sex Offenders Register was established by the Sex Offenders Act 1997 (as amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003). It contains the details of individuals convicted, cautioned or released from prison for a sexual offence against children or adults since 1997. The definition of sexual offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 is wide and covers a range of offences, against both children and adults including rape, sexual assault and possession of indecent images.

What are the notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Register?

The 2003 Sexual Offences Act requires offenders on the Sex Offenders Register to notify to their local police certain personal details including their name, address, date of birth and national insurance number. This is done initially (usually following release from custody), annually or whenever their details change. Offenders subject to the notification requirements are also required to notify the police:

  • of all foreign travel;
  • where a registered sex offender has no sole or main residence, they must notify the police weekly of the place where they can regularly be found;
  • where they are living in a household with a child under the age of 18; and
  • of bank account and credit card details and notify information about their passports or other identity documents at each notification.

The length of time an offender will remain subject to the notification requirements depends on the length of sentence, however, for those who receive a custodial sentence of 30 months or more they will remain subject to indefinite notification requirements.

The case of R v Wiles (2004) 2 Cr App R (S) 88 may have gone under the radar but it raises important questions as to how laws can be applied retrospectively and inconsistency as to how the law is applied.

Ten Year Notification Requirements

In summary, R v Wiles states that for an offence that attracts the notification requirements (prescribed sexual offences), when calculating the length of the custodial sentence, the extended licence period is to be included. So, for example, a determinate sentence of between six and thirty months without any extension period would require a notification period of ten years – the defendant serving one half  in custody and one half on licence.

Lifetime Notification Requirements

However a sentence of custody, no matter how short, that includes an extended period of supervision under section 85 Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, would in almost all cases attract a lifetime notification. This is somewhat perverse, since by agreeing to be subject to the extended licence, in order that rehabilitation can take place, a defendant will also be subject to a lifetime notification. If a defendant were to refuse the rehabilitation aspect of the sentence and receive a custodial sentence with no rehabilitation requirement the notification requirements would in all likelihood be for a set period of time rather than life!

Wiles was actually decided on the 4th March 2004 but because it went below the radar it didn’t dawn on anybody (including the Home Office) of the consequences until over a year later. But even then Judges were still not aware of it for years afterwards and were telling Defendants they were subject to ten year notifications, when in fact it was life.

As unfair as that seems, matters were further confused that not every police force in England and Wales enforced the ruling in Wiles for convictions dated prior to the 1st April 2005. So dependant on where you lived in the country would depend on whether you were subject to the notification requirements.

Sex Offender Registration Reviews

In 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that individuals subject to indefinite registration requirements under the Sex Offenders Act have the right to apply for a review as to whether their continued registration is necessary.

The review can only take place once an individual has been on the register for fifteen years (since first registration) or eight years in the case of a minor. An application can also only be made if there is no Sexual Offender Prevention Order (SOPO) in place although at Olliers we can also offer advice about discharging such an order.

The police will consider the degree of risk to the public and whether it is necessary for the individual to remain on the Sex Offenders Register for the purpose of protecting the public from sexual harm.

We can offer discrete and confidential advice including an assessment as to whether there are sufficient prospects to make an application, drafting the relevant representations and if necessary appealing any decision.

Grounds for Removal from Sex Offenders Register

The Authorities will need to know the reasons why an individual is applying for a review and will look for how the individual’s circumstances have changed compared to when the order was made. Further how an individual’s behaviour has changed, in essence showing that there is no longer a risk.

This will further require disclosing information about accommodation, relationships, employment, hobbys and attitude to offending.

We are happy to offer a fixed fee service to cover an initial consultation, drafting the application, applying to have a Sexual Offenders Prevention Order discharged and any appeal process.

Length of Notification Requirements

Click here to read more about the case of R v Wiles and how an extended period of supervision can in some cases unjustly lead to lifetime notification requirements and how this could be an abuse of process.

Recent News Items about Sex Offender Notification Requirements

  • Lie Detector Tests used to manage risk of Sex Offenders
  • The curious case of R v Wiles, its implementation and the Sex Offenders Register
  • Sexual Harm Prevention Orders and Notification Requirements
  • Can I be discharged from the Sex Offenders Register or a SHPO/SOPO

Need a Specialist Sex Offenders Register Removal Lawyer?

If you wish to discuss making an  application for removal from the Sex Offenders Register please contact us on 0161 8341515 or email us here.

null

Ruth Peters

 

 

Nathalie Potter

Nathalie Potter

 

 

Lily Grundy

Lily Grundy

null

Rebecca Dimond

Complete the form below and we will contact you

Contact Us

 

Meet Our Team of expert criminal solicitors

Follow us @Ollierssltd

Tweets by ollierssltd

Get in touch with one of our specialist solicitors today

Please let us know how best to contact you so we can best understand how to advise you.

Call us now

Request a call back

Send an online enquiry

Request a video call

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Our Lawyers
  • Pre-charge engagement
  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Fraud
  • Regulatory

London

Olliers Solicitors Ltd
Berkeley Suite
35 Berkeley Square
Mayfair
London
W1J 5BF
020 3883 6790
info@olliers.com

Manchester

Olliers Solicitors Ltd
3rd Floor
196 Deansgate
Manchester
M3 3WF
0161 834 1515
info@olliers.com

Newsletter Sign-up

Newsletter Signup

Copyright © 2022 | Authorised & Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 597078
Privacy Policy | Accessibility | Complaints | Built by SEO Strategy