• About Us
  • Careers
  • CSR
  • Our Lawyers
  • News
  • Videos
  • Funding
  • FAQs
  • London
0161 834 1515
020 3883 6790
info@olliers.com
  • Pre-Charge
    • Pre-Charge
    • Released under investigation
    • Pre-charge engagement
    • Charging guidance
    • National File Standard
  • Criminal law
    • Criminal law
    • Appeals
    • Assisting An Offender
    • Assault & grievous bodily harm
    • Autism
    • Controlling and coercive behaviour
    • Criminal defence for professionals
    • Crisis management
    • Dangerous dogs
    • Defending allegations of domestic abuse
    • Drugs offences
    • PNC arrest record removal
    • Fare Evasion Lawyers
    • Firearms
    • Internet & cyber crime
    • Kidnap & false imprisonment
    • The Magistrates’ Court
    • Murder & manslaughter
    • People trafficking & Modern Slavery Act
    • Robbery and theft
    • Terrorism
    • Voluntary police interviews
    • Youth crime
  • Sexual offences
    • Sexual offences
    • Indecent Images Offence Lawyers
    • Rape and sexual assault
    • Removal from Sex Offenders Register
    • Revenge porn
    • Sexual communication with a child
    • Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPO)
  • Fraud
    • Fraud
    • Corruption and bribery
    • Cryptocurrency investigations
    • Dawn raids
    • Defending allegations of furlough fraud
    • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigations
    • HMRC investigations
    • Insolvency Service investigations and prosecutions
    • Money laundering
    • Serious Fraud Office (SFO) investigations
  • Regulatory
    • Regulatory
    • Data Protection offences
    • Director disqualification
    • Environmental damage
    • Food safety
    • Health & Safety (HSE) prosecutions
    • General Product Safety Regulations (GPSR)
    • Intellectual property prosecutions
    • Insolvency Service Investigations
    • Public Inquiries and Inquests
    • Trading standards prosecutions
  • Professional Discipline
    • Professional Discipline
    • Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS)
    • General Medical Council (GMC) Lawyers
    • Student Misconduct Proceedings
    • Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) Lawyers
  • Asset recovery
    • Benefit and available amount
    • Criminal lifestyle POCA
    • Enforcement receivers
    • Hidden assets
    • Restraint orders
    • Sentencing & enforcement
    • Unexplained Wealth Orders
      • Uplift Applications
  • More…
    • Appealing against a conviction
    • Alcohol and fireworks offences
    • Drink driving
    • Drug driving / driving whilst unfit
    • Extradition proceedings
    • Football banning orders
    • Football offences
    • Football offences news
    • Football stadium offences
    • Motoring offences
    • Polish speaking criminal lawyer
    • Public Order Act offences
  • Contact

Medical evidence

  1. Home
  2. Criminal Investigations
  3. Charging guidance
  4. Medical evidence

Medical evidence under the Director of Public Prosecution’s Guidance on Charging 2020

The Director of Public Prosecution’s Guidance on Charging (31st December 2020) provides a clear structure in which criminal allegations are investigated and prosecuted. Defence teams must have a detailed working knowledge of the Guidance as part of a proactive pre charge engagement strategy.

This page focuses on Medical Evidence.

The significance of the Guidance for defence teams

The Olliers Investigations Team place huge emphasis in monitoring the police and their compliance with the Guidance as part of our pro-active approach to pre-charge work.

We look to engage with police at an early stage of an investigation. We always consider whether we can make representations against charge, by arguing that there is not a ‘realistic prospect of conviction’ or that it is not in the public interest to prosecute. The Guidance was published on the same day (31st December 2020) as the arrangements for ‘pre charge engagement’ (Annex B Attorney General’s Guidelines on Disclosure 2020).

Director of Public Prosecutions Max Hill QC; 

‘There has been a major shift in working practices and priorities throughout the criminal justice system in recent years and it is vital there is clear guidance to help police and prosecutors navigate these effectively.

‘The Attorney General’s guidelines focus on getting disclosure right and getting it done early so its impact on the evidence is known. These are significant changes and we must continue to work collaboratively to embed them.’

At Olliers we regard the Guidelines as a powerful resource during the pre charge engagement process.

The pre-charge relevance of Medical evidence in a criminal case

At Olliers our pre charge team appreciate the potentially huge significance of medical evidence during the investigation stage of a case. 

Key Principles

Medical evidence can be crucial in establishing key elements of an offence, the extent of injuries and provide corroboration of an allegation. Essentially it is the evidence of a medically qualified person, able to provide admissible information outside the knowledge the court. It may be provided in the form of statements, reports, or medical notes.

The DPP’s guidance is not definitive. Decisions should be based on the merits of each case and the guidance for specific offences.

Investigators and prosecutors should ensure that medical is requested at an early stage. Regard must be had to specific guidance and protocols.

Specific Offences

Battery/common assault 

Medical evidence is not normally required, the evidence of a reliable eyewitness should suffice or clear definition photographs. The provenance of a visual record should be clear.

Actual Bodily Harm 

Medical evidence is required where the injury is established through interpretation of medical records/X-rays (for example a fracture) and the injury is not accepted by a suspect. Witness observation and visual record will suffice in other circumstances.

Grievous Bodily Harm, Wounding or attempt murder

Medical evidence will be required to establish the extent of the injuries to justify the charges. The interpretation of medical records, X-rays, or other forms of imaging will be necessary. This should be achieved through a medical report or relevant medical notes. 

On rare occasions the offence may be prosecuted without medical evidence. Careful consideration should be given in cases where a complainant does not support a prosecution and release of medical records, but the evidential and public interest tests are met.

Timing 

Medical evidence should be obtained and local protocols and timeframes adhered to.

A charging decision may nevertheless be possible without medical evidence, depending on the facts of the case, the offence, and whether the decision is made on the Full Code Test or the Threshold Test.

For Full Code cases, key evidence will be available at the point of charge, including medical evidence if required to prove an element of the offence, or rebut an issue raised by the defence.

In Threshold cases, it may not have been possible to obtain a medical report or medical notes. A prosecutor may have to rely upon the police for a description of injuries, current status and latest prognosis. Significantly, information provided by the police must have come from a medical practitioner. 

A timescale for a full medical report should accompany the joint action plan in support of the Threshold Test decision.

In anticipated not guilty plea magistrates’ court cases and in all Crown court cases the prosecution must provide details of any medical evidence that is likely to be provided in relation to a complainant or a defendant. This should be done before the first hearing in the magistrates’ court. 

Victim consent

The guidance refers to the ‘victim’ although, defence practitioners prefer the term ‘complainant’. Complainants should understand why medical evidence is required. They may decline consent and should not be put under undue pressure. Alternatively they may give informed consent which would allow service of the material or qualified consent which would mean material should not be provided to the defence.

Unused material

Where medical treatment has been sought, this must be recorded and revealed to the prosecutor unless a statement from a medical practitioner is already part of the prosecution case. 

The Guidance recognises ‘the overarching principles’ set  out  in  Sir  Brian  Leveson’s review of ‘Efficiency in Criminal Proceedings’, the most important of which is perhaps the concept of ‘getting it right first time’

Police officers and prosecutors must comply with this Guidance to ensure that charging  decisions  are  fair  and  consistent,  and  comply with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, the  PACE  Codes  of  Practice, and the Code for Crown Prosecutors (“the Code”). As the police get to grips with the Guidance it is inevitable that mistakes will be made. Failure to follow the Guidance may risk cases failing or decisions being subject to legal challenge.

The guidance is issued by the DPP for police use, but the provisions apply equally to other investigators where cases are prosecuted by the CPS

At Olliers we recognise the importance of defence teams being at least as familiar with the obligations upon the police as are their police counterparts.  

Contact our pre-charge investigations lawyers

If you would like to explore how Olliers can assist you please contact Ruth Peters or Matthew Claughton for a confidential discussion.

Ruth Peters

Ruth Peters

Matthew Claughton

Matthew Claughton

Lily Grundy

Lily Grundy

Maria Douglas

Maria Douglas

Manchester Office

196 Deansgate, Manchester, M3 3WF
0161 834 1515
info@olliers.com

London Office

Berkeley Suite, 35 Berkeley Square, Mayfair, London W1J 5BF
020 3883 6790
info@olliers.com

Complete the form below and we will contact you

Contact Us

Investigations Menu

  • Investigations overview
  • Released under investigation
  • Pre-charge engagement
  • Charging guidance overview
    • Audio-visual evidence
    • Bad character evidence
    • Communication evidence
    • Forensic evidence
    • Identification evidence
    • Medical evidence
  • National File Standard
 

Related articles

  • Representations against charge and pre-charge engagement with investigators
  • Pre-charge engagement between the police and the defence
  • Pre-charge Representations – Your Last Chance to Avoid a Prosecution
  • Sexual Offences – Proactive Defence when under Investigation

Get in touch with one of our specialist solicitors today

Please let us know how best to contact you so we can best understand how to advise you.

Call us now

Request a call back

Send an online enquiry

Request a video call

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Our Lawyers
  • Pre-charge engagement
  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Fraud
  • Regulatory

London

Olliers Solicitors Ltd
Berkeley Suite
35 Berkeley Square
Mayfair
London
W1J 5BF
020 3883 6790
info@olliers.com

Manchester

Olliers Solicitors Ltd
3rd Floor
196 Deansgate
Manchester
M3 3WF
0161 834 1515
info@olliers.com

Newsletter Sign-up

Newsletter Signup

blank

Copyright © 2020 | Authorised & Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 597078
Privacy Policy | Accessibility | Complaints | Built by SEO Strategy