INCREASED USE OF SERIOUS CRIME PREVENTION ORDERS

Rightly or wrongly, SOCA takes the view that 'career criminals regard prison as an interruption', something that 'rarely marks the end of their involvement in serious crime'. It has stated that from now on, unless there are specific reasons, it will publish details of all Orders made.

The highest profile Order is the Serious Crime Prevention Order, (SCPO), which was introduced by the Serious Crime Act 2007. An Order can be made on application by the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and the Director of the Serious Fraud Office.

For an Order to be made the Court must be satisfied of two things. Firstly, that a person has been convicted of a serious offence. Secondly, that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Order would protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement in serious crime by the person in England and Wales.

A key feature is the fact that there is a real risk that the individual in question is likely to be involved in further criminal behaviour, in other words, they are a 'career criminal'.

An Order may contain:-

 

  • such prohibitions, restrictions or requirements; and
  • such other terms;
  • as a Court considers appropriate for the purpose of protecting the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the persons concerned in serious crime in England and Wales.


Examples of the types of prohibition, restriction or requirement are set out in the Serious Crime Act 2007. However, the Act is also clear that these are only examples and the type of provision that the Court can consider is entirely open, provided they are appropriate for the purpose set out above, i.e. protecting the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement in serious crime in England and Wales.

The details of Orders made to date in cases prosecuted by SOCA include the following:-

 

  • Restriction and notification of ownership, possession or control of vehicles
  • Notification of premises, owned, occupied, rented, leased or has right of access to
  • Restriction to one mobile phone handset and one SIM card
  • Non-association with co-defendants
  • Notification of changes to name and identity
  • Restriction on bank accounts:
  • Restrictions on loans in excess of £3000
  • Restriction on applying for mortgages
  • Restriction on third party financial accounts
  • Restriction and notification of travel out of the UK
  • Restriction on computer software that can reproduce an image of any official document and restricted access to the internet via one device
  • Notification and access to premises owned, rented, leased or otherwise
  • Notification of prison visitors
  • Restrictions on using the prison telephone system
  • Notification of travel outside the UK.


The SCPO is for a maximum of 5 years. All the SCPOs published on the SOCA website have been for the maximum period. A breach of an Order is punishable by a penalty of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine.

Other Orders at the disposal of SOCA, and indeed other prosecuting authorities, include Travel Restriction Orders (TROs) and Financial Reporting Orders (FROs).

A Travel Restriction Order can be imposed on an individual convicted of a drug trafficking offence and sentenced to four years or more in prison. The Order comes in to effect upon release from prison and must be for a minimum of two years. The Orders published on the SOCA website range between 2 and 5 years. The terms of the Order are almost inevitably 'no overseas travel and to surrender passport to the Court'. A breach of an Order can lead to a penalty of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine.

A Financial Reporting Order can require a convicted criminal to report all financial transactions at regular intervals. They can be for a maximum of 15 years (20 years in the case of life sentences) and those imposed to date all require individuals to report all financial transactions. Again, a breach is punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine.

SOCA talk about 'New approaches to fighting organised crime'. There is no doubt that just as society has changed dramatically over recent years so have attitudes towards law enforcement. Whether it be in the form of Asset Recovery, the Investigation of serious crime or the imposition of SCPOs, TROs or FROs, they plan to make life extremely difficult for the individuals they regard as career criminals.

 

Olliers
Castlefield Chambers,
Manchester,
M34NF.
0161 827 7010
www.olliers.com
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Notable cases

  • 2011:R –v- B, Liverpool Crown Court, acquittal of defendant in multi-million pound class A drugs conspiracy.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, Northampton Crown Court, Olliers act for Company Director in multi-million MTIC fraud.

     
  • 2011:R v S,York Crown Court instructed by accountant alleged to have conspired to defraud HMRC.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, York Crown Court, representation of defendant facing allegation of conspiracy to steal from department for Food and Rural Affairs.

     
  • 2011: R –v- B, Manchester Crown Court, acquittal of client on murder allegation.

     
  • 2010:R –v- T, Bradford Crown Court. acquittal of client in conspiracy to supply Class B.

     
  • 2011:R-v-E,  Manchester Crown Court. acquittal of client in multi-handed local council fraud.

     
  • 2011:R –v- F, Manchester Crown Court, Company Director acquitted in multi-million pound alcohol diversion fraud.

     
  • 2011 : R –v- G, Kingston Crown Court, representation of Company Director in connection with £20million MTIC fraud.

     
  • 2011:R –v- P, Birmingham Crown Court, Olliers instructed by defendant alleged to have been involved in largest ever attempt to import Class A drugs into the UK.

     
  • 2011:R –v- J, Manchester Crown Court, representation of financial advisor facing allegation of conspiracy to commit fraud during the course of a buy to let business.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, Mold Crown Court, Olliers act for charity co-ordinator facing allegations of misappropriation of funds received from Welsh Government Assembly.

     
  • 2011: R –v- B, Southwark Crown Court, representation of Director of a potato company facing bribery allegations involving major supermarket.

     
  • 2011:Olliers instructed by former Managing Director plc in connection with SFO investigation into collapse of business with bank debts of £75million.

     
  • 2011: R –v- C, Southwark Crown Court, representation of former solicitor accused of conspiring to defraud Building Society of £500,00.00.

     
  • 2010:  R –v- S, Manchester Crown Court, Acquittal of defendant in Facebook Juror Case, multi-million pound drugs conspiracy.

     
  • 2011: R –v- A, Kingston Crown Court, Olliers act for a CEO of Dubai company alleged to have been involved in multi-million pound money laundering offences


     
  • 2010:R –v- G, Mold Crown Court, Company Director acquitted following 5 week Trading Standards Timeshare prosecution.

     
Free Advice Service - Please submit your request below
 
 
 
 
 

Olliers Solicitors Awards

Olliers Solicitors,Castlefield Chambers,11 Duke Street
Manchester,M3 4NF

Web Design by Kudos Web Design Manchester
Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - SRA N0 00178501 | Sitemap | Privacy Policy