THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 : IS YOUR BUSINESS AT RISK

As of April 2011, Employers will be liable to criminal prosecution for the actions of employees involved in bribery, irrespective of whether they were aware of it, unless they can show that they had in place adequate measures to prevent bribery.

 

This is a short article aimed at small to medium sized businesses who are unlikely to have the benefit of in house legal advisors but who need to be aware of the provisions of the Bribery Act 2010, which comes into force next April.

1. Introduction

The Bribery Act differs from most forms of legislation because it can render a business liable to prosecution as a consequence of the behaviour of it’s employees – even if the Directors had no knowledge of such behaviour!

The Act creates what is known as a ‘reverse burden of proof ‘ in that it is a criminal offence for a commercial organisation to fail to prevent bribery (by it’s employees) unless the organisation can demonstrate that it had adequate bribery prevention procedures in place.

Ordinarily we have a presumption of innocence. Under the Bribery Act there is a case for saying that the opposite applies. It need not matter whether the company had actual knowledge of the actions of employees involved in bribery. The emphasis is upon whether the company had adequate measures in place to prevent bribery.

2. Main provisions

There are four types of offence that can be committed;

i.   offering, promising or giving a bribe
ii.   requesting, agreeing to receive or accepting a bribe
iii.  bribing a foreign public official
iv. failure by a commercial organisation to prevent a bribe being paid for or on it’s behalf.

3. Sentences

Upon conviction in the Crown Court any offence committed under the Act is punishable by an unlimited fine and/or up to 10 years imprisonment.

What’s more the court can impose Confiscation and Civil Recovery orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Confiscation is a highly controversial area. Take the following scenario.

A bribe of £10,000 is paid by a senior member of a sales team. The business then secures say £1,000,000 worth of business, with profits of say £100,000. Upon conviction in the Crown Court the company could be liable for a confiscation order in the sum of £1,000,000 even though the company had no actual knowledge of the actions of the bribing sales representative!

This is because under The Bribery Act, the company will be guilty unless adequate safeguards were in place and once convicted confiscation is turnover based as opposed to profit based. 

Another worrying consequence of a conviction is the risk that it may preclude a company from tendering for public contracts.

4. Safeguarding your business

It is a defence for a business to prove that it had in place procedures designed to prevent bribery. Lord Bach hit the nail on the head when he stated on behalf of the Ministry of Justice, ‘it would be wrong to leave organisations open to a heavy fine if a rogue element bribes on behalf of the organisation when those who manage it can show that they have put in place procedures designed to prevent bribery’.

The key issue therefore is having in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery.

The good news is that help is at hand. The Government is to produce Guidance on the measures businesses can put in place to prevent bribery. On 14th September  2010 the Ministry of Justice issued a Consultation on the subject. The Consultation runs for eight weeks until 8th November 2010.

The final Guidance will be available from 1st April 2011 when the Act comes into force. However the consultation contains draft guidance which contains ‘Six Principles for Bribery Prevention’ namely,

i.     Risk Assessment
ii.    Top Level Commitment
iii.    Due Diligence
iv.   Clear Policies and Procedures
v.    Effective Implementation
vi.   Monitoring and Review

It is not proposed to go into more detail in relation to the Six Principles at this stage, this will be done in a future article. What is clear is that many businesses that may have been completely unaware of the legislation will now need to start to think about gearing up for next April.

Matthew Claughton is the Managing Partner of Crime, Fraud and Regulatory specialists, Olliers Solicitors.

For more information on the Bribery Act, please contact:

Olliers
Castlefield Chambers,
Manchester,
M34NF.
0161 827 7010
www.olliers.com
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Notable cases

  • 2011:R –v- B, Liverpool Crown Court, acquittal of defendant in multi-million pound class A drugs conspiracy.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, Northampton Crown Court, Olliers act for Company Director in multi-million MTIC fraud.

     
  • 2011:R v S,York Crown Court instructed by accountant alleged to have conspired to defraud HMRC.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, York Crown Court, representation of defendant facing allegation of conspiracy to steal from department for Food and Rural Affairs.

     
  • 2011: R –v- B, Manchester Crown Court, acquittal of client on murder allegation.

     
  • 2010:R –v- T, Bradford Crown Court. acquittal of client in conspiracy to supply Class B.

     
  • 2011:R-v-E,  Manchester Crown Court. acquittal of client in multi-handed local council fraud.

     
  • 2011:R –v- F, Manchester Crown Court, Company Director acquitted in multi-million pound alcohol diversion fraud.

     
  • 2011 : R –v- G, Kingston Crown Court, representation of Company Director in connection with £20million MTIC fraud.

     
  • 2011:R –v- P, Birmingham Crown Court, Olliers instructed by defendant alleged to have been involved in largest ever attempt to import Class A drugs into the UK.

     
  • 2011:R –v- J, Manchester Crown Court, representation of financial advisor facing allegation of conspiracy to commit fraud during the course of a buy to let business.

     
  • 2011:R –v- B, Mold Crown Court, Olliers act for charity co-ordinator facing allegations of misappropriation of funds received from Welsh Government Assembly.

     
  • 2011: R –v- B, Southwark Crown Court, representation of Director of a potato company facing bribery allegations involving major supermarket.

     
  • 2011:Olliers instructed by former Managing Director plc in connection with SFO investigation into collapse of business with bank debts of £75million.

     
  • 2011: R –v- C, Southwark Crown Court, representation of former solicitor accused of conspiring to defraud Building Society of £500,00.00.

     
  • 2010:  R –v- S, Manchester Crown Court, Acquittal of defendant in Facebook Juror Case, multi-million pound drugs conspiracy.

     
  • 2011: R –v- A, Kingston Crown Court, Olliers act for a CEO of Dubai company alleged to have been involved in multi-million pound money laundering offences


     
  • 2010:R –v- G, Mold Crown Court, Company Director acquitted following 5 week Trading Standards Timeshare prosecution.

     
Free Advice Service - Please submit your request below
 
 
 
 
 

Olliers Solicitors Awards

Olliers Solicitors,Castlefield Chambers,11 Duke Street
Manchester,M3 4NF

Web Design by Kudos Web Design Manchester
Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - SRA N0 00178501 | Sitemap | Privacy Policy